Find out why our Proprietary Quality Stats has produced an incredible record of success analysing NFL teams and games for fans who bet on NFL football.
This indicator merely applies the formula used to measure passer rating to a team’s pass defense. Like all of our Quality Stats, which are based on efficiency, it has a much higher Correlation to Victory than volume stats, such as passing yards allowed. Most great teams throughout history have a very stingy Defensive Passer Rating, even if they surrendered a lot of passing yards. For example, the 2010 Super Bowl champion Packers and 2010 AFC champion Steelers finished Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, in Defensive Passer Rating. We've written numerous times about the historic importance of Defensive Passer Rating here on CHFF and here on SI.com over the years. We spoke about the importance of all three measures of passer rating at NFL Films in the summer of 2012. Bottom line: it's a killer measure of overall team success and always has been.
| Rank | Team | Attempts | Completions | Attempt/Completion Ratio | Passing Yds. | Passing Yds./Attempt | Touchdowns | Interceptions | Defensive Passer Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 = | Minnesota Vikings | 203 | 114 | 56.0% | 1,261 | 6.21 | 4 | 8 | 64.77 |
| 2 7 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 270 | 168 | 62.0% | 1,761 | 6.52 | 10 | 12 | 74.74 |
| 3 1 | Seattle Seahawks | 247 | 157 | 64.0% | 1,353 | 5.48 | 9 | 8 | 76.90 |
| 4 1 | Green Bay Packers | 284 | 181 | 64.0% | 1,767 | 6.22 | 10 | 10 | 78.40 |
| 5 1 | Los Angeles Rams | 258 | 155 | 60.0% | 1,608 | 6.23 | 10 | 7 | 79.66 |
| 6 2 | Kansas City Chiefs | 244 | 152 | 62.0% | 1,599 | 6.55 | 7 | 6 | 80.36 |
| 7 4 | Denver Broncos | 305 | 179 | 59.0% | 1,973 | 6.47 | 11 | 7 | 80.67 |
| 8 1 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 280 | 183 | 65.0% | 1,936 | 6.91 | 7 | 7 | 82.96 |
| 9 1 | Cleveland Browns | 262 | 156 | 60.0% | 1,717 | 6.55 | 11 | 6 | 83.83 |
| 10 2 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 242 | 161 | 67.0% | 1,850 | 7.64 | 8 | 9 | 85.27 |
| 11 3 | Carolina Panthers | 241 | 151 | 63.0% | 1,537 | 6.38 | 10 | 4 | 88.08 |
| 12 2 | Los Angeles Chargers | 196 | 131 | 67.0% | 1,454 | 7.42 | 8 | 6 | 89.68 |
| 13 = | New York Giants | 219 | 138 | 63.0% | 1,345 | 6.14 | 14 | 6 | 90.06 |
| 14 3 | Cincinnati Bengals | 242 | 154 | 64.0% | 1,827 | 7.55 | 8 | 4 | 91.01 |
| 15 1 | Philadelphia Eagles | 273 | 162 | 59.0% | 1,952 | 7.15 | 12 | 3 | 91.11 |
| 16 1 | Atlanta Falcons | 289 | 186 | 64.0% | 1,900 | 6.57 | 11 | 3 | 91.15 |
| 17 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 248 | 166 | 67.0% | 1,567 | 6.32 | 10 | 3 | 92.65 |
| 18 1 | New England Patriots | 257 | 170 | 66.0% | 1,884 | 7.33 | 11 | 5 | 93.79 |
| 19 1 | Baltimore Ravens | 261 | 171 | 66.0% | 1,935 | 7.41 | 11 | 4 | 95.62 |
| 20 5 | Tennessee Titans | 272 | 193 | 71.0% | 2,182 | 8.02 | 11 | 8 | 95.89 |
| 21 5 | Buffalo Bills | 268 | 169 | 63.0% | 1,883 | 7.03 | 15 | 4 | 96.31 |
| 22 1 | Houston Texans | 246 | 163 | 66.0% | 1,839 | 7.48 | 10 | 3 | 96.72 |
| 23 1 | New Orleans Saints | 230 | 152 | 66.0% | 1,748 | 7.60 | 11 | 4 | 97.45 |
| 24 3 | Chicago Bears | 228 | 143 | 63.0% | 1,877 | 8.23 | 13 | 5 | 98.74 |
| 25 4 | Washington Commanders | 253 | 168 | 66.0% | 1,820 | 7.19 | 15 | 4 | 100.22 |
| 26 1 | Detroit Lions | 287 | 189 | 66.0% | 2,091 | 7.29 | 18 | 5 | 101.11 |
| 27 5 | New York Jets | 239 | 151 | 63.0% | 1,667 | 6.97 | 14 | 1 | 101.41 |
| 28 5 | Indianapolis Colts | 230 | 141 | 61.0% | 1,810 | 7.87 | 14 | 2 | 102.37 |
| 29 1 | Dallas Cowboys | 262 | 174 | 66.0% | 1,953 | 7.45 | 15 | 3 | 102.44 |
| 30 2 | Las Vegas Raiders | 254 | 166 | 65.0% | 2,006 | 7.90 | 18 | 6 | 102.95 |
| 31 = | Arizona Cardinals | 230 | 147 | 64.0% | 1,901 | 8.27 | 18 | 3 | 110.53 |
| 32 = | Miami Dolphins | 195 | 150 | 77.0% | 1,616 | 8.29 | 16 | 4 | 119.60 |