This indicator merely applies the formula used to measure passer rating to a team’s pass defense. Like all of our Quality Stats, which are based on efficiency, it has a much higher Correlation to Victory than volume stats, such as passing yards allowed. Most great teams throughout history have a very stingy Defensive Passer Rating, even if they surrendered a lot of passing yards. For example, the 2010 Super Bowl champion Packers and 2010 AFC champion Steelers finished Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, in Defensive Passer Rating. We've written numerous times about the historic importance of Defensive Passer Rating here on CHFF and here on SI.com over the years. We spoke about the importance of all three measures of passer rating at NFL Films in the summer of 2012. Bottom line: it's a killer measure of overall team success and always has been.
| Rank | Team | Attempts | Completions | Attempt/Completion Ratio | Passing Yds. | Passing Yds./Attempt | Touchdowns | Interceptions | Defensive Passer Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 1 | Los Angeles Chargers | 505 | 307 | 61.0% | 3,314 | 6.56 | 16 | 19 | 75.13 |
| 2 1 | Philadelphia Eagles | 544 | 309 | 57.0% | 3,476 | 6.39 | 14 | 12 | 75.60 |
| 3 2 | Houston Texans | 538 | 319 | 59.0% | 3,486 | 6.48 | 20 | 19 | 75.93 |
| 4 = | Seattle Seahawks | 600 | 375 | 62.0% | 3,619 | 6.03 | 20 | 18 | 77.49 |
| 5 = | Jacksonville Jaguars | 635 | 396 | 62.0% | 3,933 | 6.19 | 25 | 22 | 78.23 |
| 6 1 | Denver Broncos | 593 | 343 | 58.0% | 3,606 | 6.08 | 18 | 10 | 78.84 |
| 7 1 | Buffalo Bills | 464 | 277 | 60.0% | 2,894 | 6.24 | 19 | 13 | 80.06 |
| 8 1 | Minnesota Vikings | 447 | 279 | 62.0% | 3,021 | 6.76 | 15 | 8 | 85.65 |
| 9 1 | Los Angeles Rams | 589 | 377 | 64.0% | 3,988 | 6.77 | 26 | 16 | 87.02 |
| 10 2 | Indianapolis Colts | 627 | 397 | 63.0% | 4,462 | 7.12 | 24 | 14 | 87.71 |
| 11 1 | Carolina Panthers | 507 | 336 | 66.0% | 3,657 | 7.21 | 20 | 15 | 87.95 |
| 12 1 | Atlanta Falcons | 529 | 331 | 63.0% | 3,773 | 7.13 | 27 | 16 | 88.70 |
| 13 1 | Baltimore Ravens | 625 | 399 | 64.0% | 4,403 | 7.04 | 23 | 11 | 89.68 |
| 14 1 | Cleveland Browns | 487 | 308 | 63.0% | 3,220 | 6.61 | 25 | 11 | 89.83 |
| 15 3 | Kansas City Chiefs | 509 | 340 | 67.0% | 3,487 | 6.85 | 18 | 10 | 90.06 |
| 16 = | Chicago Bears | 533 | 355 | 67.0% | 4,067 | 7.63 | 32 | 23 | 91.74 |
| 17 3 | New Orleans Saints | 491 | 312 | 64.0% | 3,336 | 6.79 | 25 | 10 | 92.19 |
| 18 3 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 613 | 396 | 65.0% | 4,437 | 7.24 | 30 | 15 | 92.53 |
| 19 2 | New England Patriots | 527 | 350 | 66.0% | 3,512 | 6.66 | 25 | 10 | 92.74 |
| 20 1 | Detroit Lions | 555 | 342 | 62.0% | 4,027 | 7.26 | 31 | 13 | 92.86 |
| 21 4 | Green Bay Packers | 549 | 360 | 66.0% | 3,516 | 6.40 | 24 | 7 | 93.01 |
| 22 = | New York Giants | 550 | 358 | 65.0% | 3,908 | 7.11 | 25 | 9 | 94.21 |
| 23 2 | Las Vegas Raiders | 524 | 359 | 69.0% | 3,644 | 6.95 | 23 | 8 | 96.81 |
| 24 = | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 568 | 379 | 67.0% | 4,332 | 7.63 | 30 | 13 | 97.78 |
| 25 2 | Arizona Cardinals | 572 | 375 | 66.0% | 4,128 | 7.22 | 31 | 10 | 97.95 |
| 26 1 | Cincinnati Bengals | 534 | 348 | 65.0% | 4,175 | 7.82 | 33 | 13 | 99.29 |
| 27 1 | San Francisco 49ers | 584 | 398 | 68.0% | 4,110 | 7.04 | 29 | 6 | 100.36 |
| 28 2 | Washington Commanders | 540 | 350 | 65.0% | 4,371 | 8.09 | 33 | 8 | 104.16 |
| 29 1 | Miami Dolphins | 515 | 371 | 72.0% | 3,920 | 7.61 | 29 | 9 | 105.28 |
| 30 1 | Tennessee Titans | 514 | 354 | 69.0% | 4,221 | 8.21 | 30 | 6 | 108.38 |
| 31 1 | Dallas Cowboys | 556 | 381 | 69.0% | 4,521 | 8.13 | 35 | 6 | 109.95 |
| 32 1 | New York Jets | 515 | 336 | 65.0% | 3,849 | 7.47 | 36 | 0 | 110.68 |